6 Comments
User's avatar
Judith Klinger's avatar

Great article! One thing: the statement, "California is one of a handful of states that fund districts on the number of students actually in school each day through a formula known as Average Daily Attendance (ADA). OUSD’s enrollment decline leads to lower attendance and, with it, less state revenue" conflates two things often conflated -- attendance & enrollment. When enrolled kids are absent, the dollars don't come in. It doesn't matter if a student has measles or is truant: kid not in class, no funding. Oakland has a fairly high truancy rate, compounding its declining enrollment problems. Please help the public understand this issue.

Sean S. Reinhart's avatar

Judith -- Thank you for your comment and suggestion. We have added a clarification to the article explaining that illnesses and truancy are counted against ADA. Thank you again; the suggestion is appreciated.

Judith Klinger's avatar

Fantastic! Glad I was helpful.

Ilya's avatar

OUSD pattern is similar to Oakland government: spending levels not nearly supported by revenue.

Anandika Saharan's avatar

Amazing work, Tarini, a truly interesting read.

Mindy Pechenuk's avatar

Great article, thanks Tarini. It is time to completely reorganize the OUSD. We need to put our children first. They are our future. Mississippi miracle is needed in Oakland. Our children need are real education. Mindy Pechenuk, candidate for Oakland Mayor 2026.