Discussion about this post

User's avatar
ResistProgressivePolicies's avatar

I agree with most of what you have stated. The battered voter syndrome is interesting, but I think maybe misses on a few points, IMO. Oakland loves to stand on their history, being a town of activism and protest. This permeates every facet of policy in Oakland. Everything is wrapped in progressivism with no rational thought to how far we have progressed, and is it too far? We have the city's major unions and SEIU dumping thousands of dollars into radical candidates who promise more to the unions (behind closed doors) and run on niche policies. No one runs on competence. No one in Oakland's elected government is ever asked about how much money (taxes) they spend and on what. Does MACRO meet any statistical level of success? Do the various NGOs operating on City grant money showing success? Why are Unions still demanding to work from home, depriving the City residents the services they pay for.

When I hear people complain about some billionaire buying elections, I wonder why SEIU and other major unions are not tossed in with that thought.

Oakland's cancer is their misplaced belief that more progressive policies will fix what is wrong. Until the voters demand more from elected leadership, Oakland will continue to slowly die.

Alice Friedemann's avatar

isn't the Strong Mayor-Council or Council-Manager/Hybrid supposed to make a difference? in Best and worst cities at https://wallethub.com/edu/best-run-cities/22869 the top 20 were as follows, so I really have no clue which is better, and if the issue is the underlying culture of the staff of the city, this won't matter: Strong Mayor-Council: Provo, Nampa ID, Boise, Fort Wayne, Jacksonville, Lincoln, Manchester, Missoula, Nashua, Sioux Falls

Council-Manager/Hybrid: Chesapeake, Columbus, Dover, Durham, Las Cruces, Mesa, Oklahoma City, Tallahassee, Virginia Beach, Warwick

Oakland was the 3rd worst at #146 of 148 USA cities.

I prefer solid, concrete goals that are measured. How many homeowners in the Oakland hills didn't pass the fire inspections, and did the city come in to do the necessary work and collect the fee from the homeowner? That was supposed to have been fixed 10 years ago, but I bet it hasn't. Or the people caught dumping trash, they don't pay the fines. When Oakland burns down next time, there goes a huge percent of property taxes to fund Oakland. And no chance of fixing homelessness and all the other problems. If not that, Trump's disastrous invasion of Iran stands a good chance of causing a major recession and cities having less money or even going bankrupt.

Okay, money is found. The city puts up hundreds of digital billboards in scenic areas.

So what? Are the sewer staff getting the clay pipes that cause underground leaks into Lake Temescal, Lake Merritt, and water drains getting fixed at whatever goals were set? Potholes fixed?

It seems like city planners and other experts know how things should be done, the rock bottom issue is reforming city services, with less provided per capita than 145 other cities. More auditors? They already aren't doing their jobs. Can we hire security guards since police are so damned expensive?

10 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?